Saturday, May 11, 2019

Week 17: Zoroastrianism (Finals week 1)


Week 17: Zoroastrianism (Finals week 1)
Thu 5.16 - Final exam meeting time: 11:00-12:00 p.m. (meet at TacoMania on the Paseo de San Antonio)    
Due: FRI 5.17- RESEARCH PROJECT (FINAL DRAFT—EMAIL BY 5 P.M.)*       

Upcoming:

Week 18: Indigenous Pacific Islander Religions (Finals week 2)
NO CLASS
Due: ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT (DUE TUE 5.21SUBMIT VIA CANVAS BY 5 P.M.)*

*Note new extended dates

Sunday, May 5, 2019

Week 16: Rastafarianism



Week 16: Rastafarianism
Tue 5.7/Thu 5.9*             
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop; Course review
Due: REFLECTIONS 5 & 6 (TUESDAY); RESEARCH PROJECT (FINAL DRAFT—EMAIL BY 5 P.M.)
*Final class meeting of the semester

Upcoming:
Week 17: Zoroastrianism (Finals week 1)
Thu 5.16 - Final exam meeting time: 11:00-12:00 p.m. (meet at TacoMania on the Paseo de San Antonio)              
Class: ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT (SUBMIT VIA CANVAS BY 5 P.M.)

Week 18: Indigenous Pacific Islander Religions (Finals week 2)
NO CLASS

Sunday, April 28, 2019

Week 15: Judaism

Week 15: Judaism
Tue 4.30/Thu 5.2             
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop
Due: RESEARCH PROJECT (DRAFT 2—BRING ELECTRONIC VERSION)

Upcoming:
Week 16: Rastafarianism
Tue 5.7/Thu 5.9*             
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop; Course review
Due: REFLECTIONS 5 & 6 (TUESDAY); RESEARCH PROJECT (FINAL DRAFT—EMAIL BY 5 P.M.)
*Final class meeting of the semester

Week 17: Zoroastrianism (Finals week 1)
Tue 5.14/Thu 5.16           
NO CLASS

Week 18: Indigenous Pacific Islander Religions (Finals week 2)
Final exam meeting time
Tue 5.21: 9:45-12:00 p.m. (Location TBD)              
Class: ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT (SUBMIT VIA CANVAS BY 5 P.M.)

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Reflection 6: Picking and Choosing—On Cafeteria Spiritualism


Some Mormons just can't do without caffeine, so they drink coffee. Some Catholics want control of their family planning, so they use contraceptives. Some Jews love the pageantry of Christmas, so they celebrate it come December 25th. Likewise, a person who finds comfort in Buddhist incantations, respects the environmental reverence of the Wiccans, and admires the Quaker emphasis on self-reliance might combine them into a personalized belief system. All of these are examples of the contemporary phenomenon of so-called "cafeteria spiritualism," sometimes called "salad bar spiritualism." It is the practice of individuals customizing faiths, or parts of them, to fit their individual needs. In earlier times, followers of a devout faith generally accepted all aspects of that religion on the basis that true believers wholeheartedly embraced all related tenants. Not so today. In the 21st century, Americans routinely pick and choose the aspects of a faith, or faiths, that best fit their needs. Thus, younger generations of Americans are less likely to prescribe to a specific religion, opting instead to identify themselves as the ubiquitous "spiritual, but not religious." What do you think of cafeteria spiritualism? Does it make more sense in a pluralistic society, such as ours? Or should we return to the old days, when a Catholic was a Catholic and a Jew was a Jew, etc? Finally, have you, or anyone you know, partaken in this style of faith?

Include at least two of the following in your discussion:

Required:
  • MLA Style
  • 250 words (one page)
  • Works cited 

Due: Tue 4.29 (Note the Monday due date)



Reflection 5: Actually, Thou Shalt Not—On Reconciling America's 21st Century Sexuality with Its Puritanical Roots

America is something of an anomaly in the world. As a culture, we continually bombard ourselves with sexual imagery, yet we find it difficult to have national conversations about anything of a sexual nature (see the #metoo movement). Today, Americans are more sexually open than ever before, but stigmas persist about everything from premarital sex to masturbation to promiscuity. Many view these as the vestiges of our country's Puritanical roots. Considered overly radical and pious, the Puritans fled England, settling in North America in the 1600s. They brought with them their particularly stringent style of Christianity. The Puritan view of sex was complicatedwhile they were decidedly pro-sex, so long as it happened within the confines of a marriage, sex outside of marriage was harshly punished, especially for women. Many of the Puritans' stern views of adultery, homosexuality, and promiscuity linger today, particularly among Evangelicals. Just consider their influence in national matters, such as same-sex marriage, contraception, sexual education, transgenderism, and abortion. For better or worse, the Puritans shaped the modern American sexual psyche. So today, Americans consume more pornography than anyone in the world, yet proposals for a national, comprehensive sex education program are met with fierce opposition. Few countries can encourage females to embrace their sexuality only to "slut shame" them when they do so, but we do. With such dichotomous views of sex, how is America to reconcile its 21st century sexuality with its 17th century upbringing?

Include at least two of the following in your discussion:

Required:
  • MLA Style
  • 250 words (one page)
  • Works cited 

Due: Tue 4.29 (Note the Monday due date)



Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Extra Credit: Sweeney's Letting Go of God/Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion


“I could just see him sitting on his suitcases, near the front door of my house. And I said to him, ‘I'm sorry, God, it's not you. It's me. It's just, I don't think you exist. I mean, God, look at it this way: it's really because I take you so seriously that I can't bring myself to believe in you. If it's any consolation, it's sort of a sign of respect. So, you know, sit here as long as you want to, stay for a while, if you need to, there's no big hurry.’ 

And slowly, over the course of several weeks, he disappeared.”

—Julia Sweeney, Letting Go of God

***

In Letting Go of God, devout Catholic Julia Sweeney slowly comes to embrace a new identity for herself: atheist. Through years of study and experience, she comes to the realization that the cherished religion of her youth can no longer be reconciled with an increasing sense of doubt, so she leaves her faith behind.

For this extra credit assignment, apply Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion to Sweeney's Letting Go of God. In three short answer responses, find examples of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in Sweeney's story. Use specific examples from the monologue as evidence of these appeals.

A presentation on Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion can be found HERE.

Requirements:
  • MLA Style
  • 250-500 words
  • Works cited 

Due: No later than Thu 5.16 at 5 P.M. (via emailabsolutely no late assignments accepted)
 

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Week 14: Scientology

Week 14: Scientology
Tue 4.23/Thu 4.25
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop
Due: RESEARCH PROJECT (DRAFT 1—BRING ELECTRONIC VERSION); ARISTOTELIAN APPEALS

Upcoming:

Week 15: Judaism
Tue 4.30/Thu 5.2             
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop
Due: RESEARCH PROJECT (DRAFT 2—BRING ELECTRONIC VERSION)

Week 16: Rastafarianism
Tue 5.7/Thu 5.9*             
Class: Multimedia presentations; Writers workshop; Course review
Due: REFLECTIONS 5 & 6 (TUESDAY); RESEARCH PROJECT (FINAL DRAFT—EMAIL BY 5 P.M.)
*Final class meeting of the semester

Week 17: Zoroastrianism (Finals week 1)
Tue 5.14/Thu 5.16           
NO CLASS

Week 18: Indigenous Pacific Islander Religions (Finals week 2)
Final exam meeting time
Tue 5.21: 9:45-12:00 p.m. (Location TBD)              
Class: ENGLISH DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT (SUBMIT VIA CANVAS BY 5 P.M.)